Re: [PATCH 0/82] changing CONFIG_LOCALVERSION rebuilds too much, for no good reason.

[Rogier Wolff]

On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 09:18:15PM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> one for the SCSI subsystem. If those individual driver maintainers'
> files are being modified, should they be CC'ed, or is the big patch
> just sent to the SCSI maintainer (in this example)? I just want to
> make sure the correct patch-chain is respected.

As a patch maintainer, CCed on ONE of the 82 patches, I wouldn't have
minded getting CCed on a patch that included the change to my driver. 
(as chunk xx/82 in the diff).

	Roger. 

-- 
** R.E.Wolff@xxxxxxxxxxxx ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement. 
Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific! 
Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/