Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > The real answer here is for the tickless patches to cleaned up to
> > the point where they can be merged, and then we won't waste battery
> > power entering the timer interrupt in the first place.  :-)
> 
> Whilst conceptually this is a nice idea I've yet to see any viable
> code that overall has a lower cost.  Tickless is a really nice idea
> for embedded devices and also paravirtualized hardware but I don't
> think anyone has it working well enough yet do they?

Actually for power managment uses, "NO_IDLE_HZ" seems to be enough,
and that is both implemented and working.
								Pavel
-- 
teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/