Re: FUSE merging?

From: Miklos Szeredi
Date: Thu Jun 30 2005 - 05:32:20 EST

Next message: Michael Ellerman: "[PATCH 8/12] iseries_veth: Replace lock-protected atomic with an ordinary variable"
Previous message: Michael Ellerman: "[PATCH 4/12] iseries_veth: Remove a FIXME WRT deletion of the ack_timer"
In reply to: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: FUSE merging?"
Next in thread: Avuton Olrich: "Re: FUSE merging?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> By the same argument:
> Then can you please accept that FUSE will not get merged right now.

Yes.

My argument is: IF it's not going to get merged now, can we please
continue the discussion about why it's unacceptable, and what are the
alternatives.

Is that fair?

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michael Ellerman: "[PATCH 8/12] iseries_veth: Replace lock-protected atomic with an ordinary variable"
Previous message: Michael Ellerman: "[PATCH 4/12] iseries_veth: Remove a FIXME WRT deletion of the ack_timer"
In reply to: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: FUSE merging?"
Next in thread: Avuton Olrich: "Re: FUSE merging?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]