Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status

[Andi Kleen]

On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 11:44:55AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> vs and zam, please comment on what we get from our profiler and spinlock
> debugger that the standard tools don't supply.  I am sure you have a
> reason, but now is the time to articulate it.
> 
> We would like to keep the disabled code in there until we have a chance
> to prove (or fail to prove) that cycle detection can be resolved
> effectively, and then with a solution in hand argue its merits.

How about the review of your code base? Has reiser4 ever been
fully reviewed by people outside your group? 

Normally full review is a requirement for merging.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/