Re: [RFC] cleanup patches for strings

From: Denis Vlasenko
Date: Tue Jun 21 2005 - 09:03:49 EST


On Tuesday 21 June 2005 17:38, cutaway@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Congratulations, you proved that a register push is faster than a 3 byte
> memory push. I believe this is exactly what I said would happen if the
> autovar pointer wound up being enregistered.
>
> However, it is NOT what GCC will generate for pushing params to static
> strings.
>
> For that you're going to get a 5 byte PUSH imm32.

My fault, I already mailed the corrected program.
Please see it. Now please admit you were wrong.
--
vda

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/