Re: [PATCH] ReiserFS _get_block_create_0 wrong behavior when I/Ofails

From: fs
Date: Thu Jun 16 2005 - 01:06:58 EST


Dear Vladimir Saveliev,
On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 11:41, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:

> > Patch:
> > diff -uNp /tmp/linux-2.6.12-rc6/fs/reiserfs/inode.c /tmp/linux-2.6.12-rc6.new/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
> > --- /tmp/linux-2.6.12-rc6/fs/reiserfs/inode.c 2005-06-06 11:22:29.000000000 -0400
> > +++ /tmp/linux-2.6.12-rc6.new/fs/reiserfs/inode.c 2005-06-15 13:56:45.552564512 -0400
> > @@ -254,6 +254,7 @@ static int _get_block_create_0 (struct i
> > char * p = NULL;
> > int chars;
> > int ret ;
> > + int result ;
> > int done = 0 ;
> > unsigned long offset ;
> >
> > @@ -262,7 +263,8 @@ static int _get_block_create_0 (struct i
> > (loff_t)block * inode->i_sb->s_blocksize + 1, TYPE_ANY, 3);
> >
> > research:
> > - if (search_for_position_by_key (inode->i_sb, &key, &path) != POSITION_FOUND) {
> > + result = search_for_position_by_key (inode->i_sb, &key, &path) ;
> > + if (result != POSITION_FOUND) {
> > pathrelse (&path);
> > if (p)
> > kunmap(bh_result->b_page) ;
> > @@ -270,7 +272,8 @@ research:
> > // That there is some MMAPED data associated with it that is yet to be written to disk.
> > if ((args & GET_BLOCK_NO_HOLE) && !PageUptodate(bh_result->b_page) ) {
> > return -ENOENT ;
> > - }
> > + }else if (result == IO_ERROR)
> > + return -EIO ;
> > return 0 ;
> > }
> >
>
> Your patch is incomplete. There is one more search_for_position_by_key
> at the end of this function. You probably want to check its return value
> also.
I notice there's a comment
if (search_for_position_by_key (inode->i_sb, &key, &path) !=
POSITION_FOUND)
// we read something from tail, even if now we got IO_ERROR <-
Here, can you explain more ?
break;



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/