Re: RT patch acceptance

[Karim Yaghmour]

Bill Huey (hui) wrote:
> This is really interesting code. It's really not unlike what preempt RT
> is already doing with the atomic locking (replacement). From the looks
> of it conversion of an ethernet driver to be RT capable is shockingly
> trivial.

It is. In some cases you need to provide alternate functions, but in
most not ... However, note that this is for UDP. There is no such
thing as deterministic TCP.

Karim
-- 
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || karim@xxxxxxxxxxx || 1-866-677-4546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/