Re: RT patch acceptance

[Zwane Mwaikambo]

On Sat, 28 May 2005, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:

> On Fri, 27 May 2005, Bill Huey wrote:
> 
> > > It isn't clear to me yet. I'm sure you can make your interrupt
> > > latencies look good, as with your scheduling latencies. But when
> > 
> > My project was getting a solid spike at 4 usec for irq-thread
> > startups and Ingo's stuff is better. It's already there.
> 
> Is that worst case?

So is that some sort of observable worst case value with a suitable 
stress test load? You didn't answer this in your reply. I'll be setting up 
my own test system soon to have a better look.

Thanks,
	Zwane
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/