Re: RT patch acceptance

[Karim Yaghmour]

Esben Nielsen wrote:
> But if you do have to maintain your own driver it is a lot easier to start
> from an existing and fix that one than it is to start all over. I bet the
> modifcations aren't too big for many drivers anyways. When I get more time
> I'll try to look into some drivers. Many of them is propably just about
> removing printk's and the like.

Right, and that's exactly what you've got with RT-net (at least the last
time I used it 4 years ago.) You took the standard Ethernet driver from
Linux and modified a few calls, and bingo, you had an rt-net driver based
on the standard Linux driver ... all of which in RTAI ...

Karim
-- 
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || karim@xxxxxxxxxxx || 1-866-677-4546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/