Re: RAID-5 design bug (or misfeature)

From: Bernd Eckenfels
Date: Sun May 29 2005 - 18:59:16 EST


In article <Pine.LNX.4.58.0505300043540.5305@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> you wrote:
> I think Linux should stop accessing all disks in RAID-5 array if two disks
> fail and not write "this array is dead" in superblocks on remaining disks,
> efficiently destroying the whole array.

I agree with you, however it is a pretty damned stupid idea to use raid-5
for a root disk (I was about to say it is not a good idea to use raid-5 on
linux at all :)

Gruss
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/