Re: RT patch acceptance

[Karim Yaghmour]

[side-note]

Sven-Thorsten Dietrich wrote:
> If you are truly interested, there are a lot of papers about RT. There
> are nanokernel implementations and patents you can review, and there is
> a lot of controversy.

Please drop the patent topic, it hasn't been relevant for years. If
you search the LKML archives for the initial release of Adeos, you
will see a thread where that specific topic is cleared up. If still
in doubt, do read the actual relevant patent application(s?), you
will see that no nanokernel/hyervisor out there fits the described
method. Not to mention that hypervisors/nanokernels have been there
for decades ... The specific patent that covers dual-kernels does
not even attempt to claim it covers the broad world of nanokernels/
hypervisors.

Hope this clears this bit, and please don't drag this further. That
particular topic has been debated more than enough, and I've said
what I had to say about it many times already. From that point of
view, I fully agree with you that there's no need to waste people's
time further.

With that said, let's go back to talking about the actual technical
arguments :D

Karim
-- 
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || karim@xxxxxxxxxxx || 1-866-677-4546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/