Re: RT patch acceptance

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> wrote:

> AFAIK the kernel has quite regressed recently, but that was not true 
> (for reasonable sound) at least for some earlier 2.6 kernels and some 
> of the low latency patchkit 2.4 kernels.

(putting my scheduler maintainer hat on) was this under a stock !PREEMPT 
kernel? If you can reproduce it personally, could you try the 
PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY option available in 2.6.12-rc5-mm1? [Despite its name 
it only adds cond_resched()s, not any heavier preempt mechanism.]

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/