Re: Playing with SATA NCQ

[Jeff Garzik]

Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, May 27 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > > I double checked this. If you agree to move the setting of QCFLAG_ACTIVE
> > > _after_ successful ap->ops->qc_issue(qc) and clear it _after_
> > > __ata_qc_complete(qc) then I can just use that bit and kill
> > > ATA_QCFLAG_ACCOUNT.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> >
> > Fine with me.
> >
> > Keep in mind that the attached patch was applied recently...
>
>
> Yeah, the two hunks from the ncq patch would look like this then. Ok?

ACK (modulo my distaste for 'depth' and 'ncq_depth', of course... :))


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/