Re: [PATCH] SATA NCQ support

From: Jens Axboe
Date: Fri May 27 2005 - 02:49:17 EST


On Fri, May 27 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >Update the patch, it's against bleeding edge git (applies to 2.6.12-rc5
> >as well). Changes:
>
> I'll throw this into libata-dev branch "ncq" right now.

Ok cool.

> >+static void ahci_host_ncq_intr_err(struct ata_port *ap)
> >+{
> >+ void *mmio = ap->host_set->mmio_base;
> >+ void *port_mmio = ahci_port_base(mmio, ap->port_no);
> >+ char *buffer;
> >+
> >+ printk(KERN_ERR "ata%u: ncq interrupt error\n", ap->id);
> >+
> >+ ahci_intr_error(ap, readl(port_mmio + PORT_IRQ_STAT));
> >+
> >+ buffer = kmalloc(512, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> cannot use GFP_KERNEL in interrupt context

Duh of course, I moved this call from eh_strategy callback to interrupt
as well and forgot to change the allocation mask. I'll fix that up when
fixing the error handling.

> >@@ -2868,6 +2995,21 @@
> > int ata_qc_issue(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
> > {
> > struct ata_port *ap = qc->ap;
> >+ int rc = ATA_QC_ISSUE_FATAL;
> >+
> >+ /*
> >+ * see if we can queue one more command at this point in time, see
> >+ * comment at ata_qc_issue_ok(). NCQ commands typically originate
> >from
> >+ * the SCSI layer, we can ask the mid layer to defer those commands
> >+ * similar to a QUEUE_FULL condition on a 'real' SCSI device
> >+ */
> >+ if (!ata_qc_issue_ok(ap, qc, 0)) {
> >+ if (qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_DEFER)
> >+ return ATA_QC_ISSUE_DEFER;
> >+
> >+ ata_qc_issue_wait(ap, qc);
> >+ assert(ata_qc_issue_ok(ap, qc, 0));
> >+ }
> >
>
> This is too late. We shouldn't get to this point and find out, "uh oh,
> queue full."
>
> ata_qc_new() should fail to obtain a qc if the queue is full, at which
> point you may directly return queue-full.
>
> If ata_qc_new() succeeds, but wish to wait for the queue to drain, add
> that logic -much- earlier than the ata_qc_issue() call. I would rather
> have that logic at a higher level.

That is the typical case, ata_qc_new() succeeds but we cannot issue the
command yet. So where do you want this logic placed? You cannot drop the
host_lock in-between, as that could potentially change the situation.

> >+int ata_scsi_change_queue_depth(struct scsi_device *sdev, int queue_depth)
> >+{
> >+ struct ata_port *ap;
> >+ struct ata_device *dev;
> >+ int max_depth;
> >+
> >+ if (sdev->id >= ATA_MAX_DEVICES)
> >+ return sdev->queue_depth;
> >+
> >+ ap = (struct ata_port *) &sdev->host->hostdata[0];
> >+ dev = &ap->device[sdev->id];
> >+
> >+ max_depth = min(sdev->host->can_queue, ata_id_queue_depth(dev->id));
> >+ if (queue_depth > max_depth)
> >+ queue_depth = max_depth;
> >+
> >+ scsi_adjust_queue_depth(sdev, MSG_SIMPLE_TAG, queue_depth);
> >+ return queue_depth;
> >+}
>
> Please add this function immediately above, or below,
> ata_scsi_slave_config(). That will make backporting to 2.4.x easier.

No problem, done.

> >===================================================================
> >--- 3ac9a34948049bff79a2b2ce49c0a3c84e35a748/include/linux/ata.h
> >(mode:100644)
> >+++ uncommitted/include/linux/ata.h (mode:100644)
> >@@ -79,7 +79,8 @@
> > ATA_NIEN = (1 << 1), /* disable-irq flag */
> > ATA_LBA = (1 << 6), /* LBA28 selector */
> > ATA_DEV1 = (1 << 4), /* Select Device 1 (slave) */
> >- ATA_DEVICE_OBS = (1 << 7) | (1 << 5), /* obs bits in dev
> >reg */
> >+ ATA_DEVICE_OBS = (1 << 5), /* obs bits in dev reg */
> >+ ATA_FPDMA_FUA = (1 << 7), /* FUA cache bypass bit */
> > ATA_DEVCTL_OBS = (1 << 3), /* obsolete bit in devctl
> > reg */
> > ATA_BUSY = (1 << 7), /* BSY status bit */
> > ATA_DRDY = (1 << 6), /* device ready */
>
> Don't do this. You can add ATA_FPDMA_FUA, but don't arbitrarily change
> ATA_DEVICE_OBS.
>
> This is something that may have to be done on a per-device basis.

Agree, I'll just remove it as FUA isn't used yet anyways.

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/