Re: RT patch acceptance

[Gene Heskett]

On Wednesday 25 May 2005 01:17, Nick Piggin wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>>On Tuesday 24 May 2005 22:20, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>Sven Dietrich <sdietrich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>I think people would find their system responsiveness /
>>>> tunability goes up tremendously, if you drop just a few
>>>> unimportant IRQs into threads.
>>>
>>>People cannot detect the difference between 1000usec and 50usec
>>>latencies, so they aren't going to notice any changes in
>>>responsiveness at all.
>>
>>Excuse me?
>
>You are excused ;)
>
>> 1 second (1000 usecs, 200 times your 50 usec example) is
>
>1000usecs is 1msec.

Duh, my mistake. And it probably wouldn't do to plead alzheimers 
either, darn.

[...]

>This is a topic that for some reason will tend to degenerate into a
> random shouting match where nobody actually says anything or
> listens to anything, and nothing gets done. Not to say you are
> trying to start a flamewar, Gene, but everyone just needs to tread
> a bit carefully :)

Duely chastised.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/