Re: RT patch acceptance

[john cooper]

Daniel Walker wrote:
> The main reason for my email is that I know Andrew and Linus don't want
> interrupts in threads. Without that there is no PREEMPT_RT . If you want
> to narrow the discussion to just interrupts in threads that's fine with
> me, cause that's what I'm concerned about.

Again, what are the technical arguments against scheduled
interrupts causing these folks concern?  All in all it is
just a different locking paradigm where interrupt-initiated
scheduling is moved closer to the metal.

-john

--
john.cooper@xxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/