Re: RT patch acceptance

[Karim Yaghmour]

Esben Nielsen wrote:
> I find that a bad approach:
> 1) You don't have RT in userspace.
> 2) You can't use Linux drivers for standeard hardware when you want it to
> be part of your deterministic RT application.

Please have a look at RTAI/fusion. For the record, RTAI has been providing
hard-rt in standard Linux user-space for over 5 years now. With RTAI/Fusion
this gets even better as there isn't even a special API ...

Here are a few links if you're interested:
http://www.rtai.org/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=1
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111634653913840&w=2

Karim
-- 
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || karim@xxxxxxxxxxx || 1-866-677-4546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/