[no subject]
From: root
Date: Tue May 24 2005 - 05:17:09 EST
by smtp.nexlab.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1474CFA32
for <chiakotay@xxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 24 May 2005 09:47:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
id S261361AbVEXGin (ORCPT <rfc822;chiakotay@xxxxxxxxx>);
Tue, 24 May 2005 02:38:43 -0400
Received: (majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) by vger.kernel.org id S261355AbVEXGim
(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
Tue, 24 May 2005 02:38:42 -0400
Received: from rev.193.226.233.9.euroweb.hu ([193.226.233.9]:36873 "EHLO
dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
id S261321AbVEXGiK (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>);
Tue, 24 May 2005 02:38:10 -0400
Received: from miko by dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DaSCb-0003Tw-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 07:43:41 +0200
To: mikew@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx,
linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
akpm@xxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <429277CA.9050300@xxxxxxxxxx> (message from Mike Waychison on
Mon, 23 May 2005 17:39:38 -0700)
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces
References: <1116627099.4397.43.camel@localhost> <E1DZNSN-0006cU-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1116660380.4397.66.camel@localhost> <E1DZP37-0006hH-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050521134615.GB4274@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1DZlVn-0007a6-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <429277CA.9050300@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-Id: <E1DaSCb-0003Tw-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 07:43:41 +0200
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> FWIW, all this stuff has already been done and posted here.
>
> Detachable chunks of vfsmounts:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=109872862003192&w=2
>
> 'Soft' reference counts for manipulating vfsmounts without pinning them
> down:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109872797030644&w=2
I think this might just interest Jamie Lokier. He had a very similar
poposal recently, but without reference to this patch, so I guess he
wasn't aware of it.
> Referencing vfsmounts in userspace using a file descriptor:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109871948812782&w=2
Why not just use /proc/PID/fd/FD?
> walking mountpoints in userspace:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109875012510262&w=2
Is this needed? Userspace can find out mountpoints from /proc/mounts
(or something similar for detached trees).
> attaching mountpoints in userspace:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=109875063100111&w=2
Again, bind from/to /proc/PID/fd/FD should work without any new
interfaces.
> detaching mountpoints in userspace:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109880051800963&w=2
What's wrong with sys_umount()?
> getting info from a vfsmount:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109875135030473&w=2
/proc or /sys should do fine for this purpose I think.
I agree, that having "floating trees" could be useful, but I don't see
the point of adding new interfaces to support it.
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/