[no subject]
From: root
Date: Tue May 24 2005 - 04:19:45 EST
by smtp.nexlab.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3C4FB60
for <chiakotay@xxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 24 May 2005 09:58:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
id S261383AbVEXHOX (ORCPT <rfc822;chiakotay@xxxxxxxxx>);
Tue, 24 May 2005 03:14:23 -0400
Received: (majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) by vger.kernel.org id S261392AbVEXHOT
(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
Tue, 24 May 2005 03:14:19 -0400
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.193]:33354 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com")
by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261383AbVEXHON convert rfc822-to-8bit
(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>);
Tue, 24 May 2005 03:14:13 -0400
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so2500606wri
for <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 24 May 2005 00:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=Y+AtHMac8HQzy5TaUfp4m0PBpzm0oAMdJiagefK39WeGGEUJ5tsNmxB8/E8QQ7ogyF+wwNow0lFWPQSmPezl80gGMfsCCrapBjh+Y3kxnJgLm65p+UG0vlwELW1k6BUnnasteKf0+Tw6+L+5o+csx3BfGv0UYJXZvu2OxvCB+hw=
Received: by 10.54.117.4 with SMTP id p4mr4023181wrc;
Tue, 24 May 2005 00:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.66.13 with HTTP; Tue, 24 May 2005 00:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <84144f0205052400143e97796e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 10:14:12 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "ericvh@xxxxxxxxx" <ericvh@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 2/7] v9fs: VFS file and directory operations (2.0-rc6)
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
v9fs-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-Reply-To: <200505232225.j4NMPXe1029024@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200505232225.j4NMPXe1029024@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
On 5/24/05, ericvh@xxxxxxxxx <ericvh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +static ssize_t
> +v9fs_file_write(struct file *filp, const char __user * data,
> + size_t count, loff_t * offset)
> +{
> + int ret = -1;
> + char *buffer;
> +
> + buffer = kmalloc(count, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (buffer == NULL) {
> + BUG();
I think simply returning -ENOMEM is sufficient. BUG seems way too
aggressive. (Found this in other places as well.)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/