Re: [PATCH] fix race in mark_mounts_for_expiry()

[David Howells]

Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> There's still the problem of cmpxchg meddling in the internals of an
> atomic_t.  Is that OK?  Will that work on all archs?

Probably. It might be worth defining an atomic_cmpxchg() op to formalise it
though:

	int atomic_cmpxchg(atomic_t *p, int old, int new);

The main reason for this is that atomic_t is mostly a 32-bit value, I think,
and cmpxchg() may sometimes enforce a 64-bit value.

It can be made to work on PPC, PPC64, x86, x86_64, frv. I imagine it'll work
on MIPS, sparc and alpha too without too much trouble. Dunno about the rest.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/