Re: [PATCH][MMC] Secure Digital (SD) support

[Pierre Ossman]

Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Russell King wrote:
> 
>> We'll also need to run this by Linus first, explaining why you believe
>> it's now ok to merge this.  (Added Linus...)
>>
> 
> It was also pointed out in the previous thread by myself, Alan Cox and
> Ian Molton that SD specs have been publically available from different
> companies for quite some time. As such it is difficult for anyone to
> claim that these are secret and can be regulated by a NDA. The only part
> that hasn't been found in the wild is the spec for the 'secure' parts of
> the cards. But that also means that it isn't included in this patch so
> it shouldn't pose a problem.
> 

This issue doesn't seem to reach any kind of resolution so I figured I'd
take a poke at the people responsible. :)

Just to back up the claim that the specs are in the open here are some
links:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Secure+Digital+Card%22+%22Product+Manual%22+site%3Asandisk.com&btnG=Google+Search

Which gives you several PDF:s with enough information to implement a SD
host. The one I've been using is:

http://www.sandisk.com/download/Product%20Manuals/Product%20ManualSDCardv1.7.pdf


Rgds
Pierre
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/