Re: [PATCH 1a/7] dlm: core locking

[Daniel Phillips]

On Monday 25 April 2005 17:17, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > +     int error = -ENOMEM, last_len, count = 0;
>
> Wouldn't
>         int error = -ENOMEM;
>         int last_len;
>         int count = 0;
> be a bit more readable?

The rest of your nits are fine, upstanding nits, but this one seems a little 
extreme :-)

Regards,

Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/