Re: poor SATA performance under 2.6.11 (with < 2.6.11 is OK)?

[Tomasz Chmielewski]

Chris Wright wrote:
> * Tomasz Chmielewski (mangoo@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>
> > or should I wait for 2.6.11.7 (?), where it should be corrected?

well, indeed, a week ago or more :)


> Wait, no longer, 2.6.11.7 has been here already ;-)  However, nothing in
> this area was touched.  If there's an outstanding issue, please chase it
> down, and if it's reasonable regression fix we can consider it for
> the -stable tree.

OK so Tomasz Torch suggested that my drive was blacklisted somewhere 
after 2.6.8.1 (it's the last kernel on which I have good performance).

Does drive blacklisting = very poor performance?
And no drive blacklisting = good performance, and possibly data corruption?


Tomek
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/