Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc1-mm4] fork_connector: add a fork connector

[Andrew Morton]

Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:43:24PM -0700, Jay Lan (jlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > I based my listen program on the fclisten.c posted by Kaigai Kohei
> > with my own modification. Unfortunately i lost my test machine in the
> > lab. I will recreate the listen program Monday. The original listener
> > did not validate sequence number. It also prints length of data and
> > sequence number of every message it receives. My listener prints
> > only out-of-sequence error messages.
> > 
> > The fork generator fork-test.c was yours? I called it fork-test
> > and let it run continuously in while-loop:
> > 
> > # while 1
> > # ./fork-test 10000000
> > # sleep 1
> > # end
> > 
> > I let it do 10,000,000 times of fork continuously while the system
> > is running AIM7 and/or ubench.
> > 
> > The original fclisten.c and fork-test.c are attached for your reference.
> 
> It is pretty normal to see duplicated numbers in a fork test - 
> I observed it too, since counter is incremented without locks
> we can catch situation when it is incremented simultaneously 
> on both processors, the latest version of the fork connector
> from Guillaume contains processor id in the message and per cpu counters, 
> so one can destinguish messages which sequence numbers will flow
> in a very similar way now.

Oh come on, that's just daft.  Evgeniy, put a lock in there and fix it up.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/