Re: [PATCH] Priority Lists for the RT mutex

[Daniel Walker]

On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 23:28, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> this one looks really clean.
> 
> it makes me wonder, what is the current status of fusyn's? Such a light 
> datastructure would be much more mergeable upstream than the former 
> 100-queues approach.


	Inaky was telling me that 100 queues approach is two years old. 

The biggest problem is that fusyn has it's own PI system .. So it's not
clear if that will work with the RT mutex,. I was thinking the PI stuff
could be made generic so, fusyn, maybe futex, can use it also .

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/