Re: [PATCH] Updated: Dynamic Tick version 050408-1

[Tony Lindgren]

* Frank Sorenson <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [050408 01:49]:
> Tony Lindgren wrote:
> | * Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [050407 23:28]:
> |
> |>I think I have an idea on what's going on; Your system does not wake to
> |>APIC interrupt, and the system timer updates time only on other
> interrupts.
> |>I'm experiencing the same on a loaner ThinkPad T30.
> |>
> |>I'll try to do another patch today. Meanwhile it now should work
> |>without lapic in cmdline.
> |
> |
> | Following is an updated patch. Anybody having trouble, please try
> | disabling CONFIG_DYN_TICK_USE_APIC Kconfig option.
> |
> | I'm hoping this might work on Pavel's machine too?
> |
> | Tony
> 
> This updated patch seems to work just fine on my machine with lapic on
> the cmdline and CONFIG_DYN_TICK_USE_APIC disabled.
> 
> Also, you were correct that removing lapic from the cmdline allowed the
> previous version to run at full speed.

Cool.

> Now, how can I tell if the patch is doing its thing?  What should I be
> seeing? :)

Download pmstats from http://www.muru.com/linux/dyntick/, you may
need to edit it a bit for correct ACPI battery values. But it should
show you HZ during idle and load. I believe idle still does not go
to ACPI C3 with dyn-tick though...

Then you might as well run timetest from same location too to make
sure your clock keeps correct time.

> Functionally, it looks like it's working.  There were a number of
> compiler warnings you might wish to fix before calling it good.  Such as
> "initialization from incompatible pointer type" several times in
> dyn-tick-timer.c and a "too many arguments for format" in
> dyn_tick_late_init.

Yeah, I'll fix those...

Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/