RE: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels

[Linus Torvalds]

On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> 
> No, there are no idle time on the system. If system become I/O bound, we
> would do everything we can to remove that bottleneck, i.e., throw a couple
> hundred GB of memory to the system, or add a couple hundred disk drives,
> etc.  Believe it or not, we are currently CPU bound and that's the reason
> why I care about every single cpu cycle being spend in the kernel code.

Can you post oprofile data for a run? Preferably both for the "best case"  
2.6.x thing (no point in comparing 2.4.x oprofiles with current) and for
"current kernel", whether that be 2.6.11 or some more recent snapshot?

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/