Re: [PATCH] slab: kfree(null) is unlikely

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue Mar 29 2005 - 03:09:59 EST


Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > ChangeSet 1.2231.1.8, 2005/03/28 19:18:25-08:00, akpm@xxxxxxxx
> >
> > [PATCH] slab: kfree(null) is unlikely
> >
> > - mark kfree(NULL) as being unlikely
>
> This is just a wild guess, right?

More like a judgement based on experience?

> Seems to me, it depends on the code.
>

If someone is doing kfree(0) with sufficient frequency for this patch to
matter, then they need to stop doing that, rather than pessimising kfree(not 0).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/