Re: klists and struct device semaphores

[David Brownell]

On Monday 28 March 2005 9:44 am, Patrick Mochel wrote:

> How is this related to (8) above? Do you need some sort of protected,
> short path through the core to add the device, but not bind it or add it
> to the PM core?

Erm, why is there a distinction between "adding device" and "adding it
to the PM core"?  That's a conceptual problem right there.  There
should be no distinctio.  (But it does make eminent sense to be able
to add a device without necessarily binding it to a driver, since
the "unbound driver" state is all over the place.)

- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/