Re: [PATCH] API for true Random Number Generators to add entropy (2.6.11)

From: Herbert Xu
Date: Fri Mar 25 2005 - 01:59:39 EST


On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 09:59:18AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>
> It is not only about userspace/kernelspace system calls and data
> copying,
> but about whole revalidation process, which can and is quite expensive,
> due to system calls, copying and validating itself,

What I meant is if you don't need the revalidation then don't do it.
That's the advantage of having it in user-space, *you* get to decide,
not us.

> And what about initial bootup? When system needs to create randoom
> IP/dhcp/any ids? What about small router?

Let's not reinvent the wheel, this is exactly what initramfs is for.
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/