Re: How's the nforce4 support in Linux?

[Asfand Yar Qazi]

Asfand Yar Qazi wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > > * "hardware firewall" -- sounds silly.  Pretty sure Linux doesn't 
> > > support
> > > it in any case.
> >
> >
> > probably just one of those things implemented in the binary drivers in
> > software, just like the "hardware" IDE raid is most of the time (3ware
> > being the positive exception there)
>
> http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Hardware/Previews/nvnforce4/3.html
>
> You're right there - some semi-hardware support combined with drivers 
> apparently result in lower CPU usage that software firewalls.  Apparently.
>
> Actually, these people like it:
> http://www.bjorn3d.com/read.php?cID=712&pageID=1096
>
> However one feature that you can't laugh at is the fact that it can be 
> made to block packets in the span of time between the OS being loaded 
> up, and the "real" firewall coming up.  This small time span 
> theoretically leaves the PC vulnerable, so I think this is the only use 
> for "ActiveAmor Firewall".
>
> However, this doesn't answer my original question (which I suppose I 
> should have made clearer): can I get SATA II NCQ support in Linux with 
> an nForce 4 chipset?

Argh already been answered.  Another question: which add-in SATA RAID 
boards (preferably in PCI Express flavour) support NCQ fully and will 
be fully supported in Linux?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/