On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:10:13 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hugh Dickins <hugh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Luck, Tony wrote:umm, given the difficulty which you guys are having with this, I get a bit
> > But I'm still confused by all the math on addr/end at each
> level.
You think the rest of us are not ;-?
worried about clarity, simplicity and maintainability of the end result.
We're working on it, trust me :-)
I have a simplification in mind that should take care of the issue
that led us to these problems. We should simply pass in "ceiling"
as "-1" instead of "0". Every single test against ceiling is
really done against "ceiling - 1".
Therefore, passing ceiling in as "top - 1" and then adjusting the
tests will clean this up substantially and make is much simpler.