Re: [PATCH][2/2] SquashFS

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

[I'm not sure if I should further feed the trolls.]

> >Yes, it *is* rather unfair. Sorry about that. But having 2 different
> >limited compressed filesystems in kernel does not seem good to me.

> what do you need e.g. reiserfs 4 for? or jfs? or xfs? does not ext2/3 
> the journalling job also?
> is there really a need for cifs and samba and ncpfs and nfs v3 and nfs 
> v4? why?

Take a look at debate that preceded xfs merge. And btw reiserfs4 is
*not* merged.

And people merging xfs/reiserfs4/etc did address problems pointed out
in their code.
								Pavel
-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/