/proc/$pid/mem

From: Richard Fuchs
Date: Sat Mar 19 2005 - 04:10:19 EST


Aloha!

I know it has been discussed before, but I must express my feelings about this issue nonetheless. I find it a major pain in the back that /proc/$pid/mem isn't readable by an unrelated process without doing a PTRACE_ATTACH first.

I mainly want to ask: is there a good reason to not drop this restriction?

I can read all the machine's physical memory and all of the kernel's address space (/dev/mem, /proc/kcore) non-intrusively, but I can't do the same on a single process. It seems to me that /proc/$pid/mem should work analogous to /dev/mem or /proc/kcore, but currently in practice it doesn't, and I don't see a good reason why it is supposed to be that way.

Cheers
Richard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/