Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/6] sparsemem: more separation between NUMA andDISCONTIG

[Andrew Morton]

Dave Hansen <haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  There is some confusion with the SPARSEMEM patch between what
>  is needed for DISCONTIG vs. NUMA.  For instance, the NODE_DATA()
>  macro needs to be switched on NUMA, but not on FLATMEM.
> 
>  This patch is required if the previous patch is applied.

This patch breaks !CONFIG_NUMA ppc64:

include/linux/mmzone.h:387:1: warning: "NODE_DATA" redefined
include/asm/mmzone.h:55:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition

I'll hack around it for now.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/