Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error

[chas williams - CONTRACTOR]

In message <20050316181532.GA3251@xxxxxxxxx>,Adrian Bunk writes:
>Letting CONFIG_BRIDGE depend on CONFIG_ATM doesn't sound like a good 
>idea, since I doubt all people using the Bridge code require ATM 
>support.

i agree.

>Moving the hooks to the bridge code will give you exactly the same 
>problems the other way round.

how about moving them to a third location like net/core/dev.c?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/