Re: [PATCH] Xen/i386 cleanups - io_remap_pfn_range

[Randy.Dunlap]

Keir Fraser wrote:
> This patch introduces a new interface function for mapping bus/device
> memory: io_remap_pfn_range. This accepts the same parameters as
> remap_pfn_range (indeed, by default it is implemented by this existing
> function) but should be used in any situation where the caller is not
> simply remapping ordinary RAM. For example, when mapping device
> registers the new function should be used. 
>
> The distinction between remapping device memory and ordinary RAM is
> critical for the Xen hypervisor. This may also serve as a starting
> point for cleaning up remaining users of io_remap_page_range (in
> particular, the several sparc-specific sections in various drivers
> that use a special form of io_remap_page_range).
>
> I have audited the drivers/ and sound/ directories. Most uses of
> remap_pfn_range are okay, but there are a small handful that are
> remapping device memory (mostly AGP and DRM drivers).
>
> Of particular driver is the HPET driver, whose mmap function is broken
> even for native (non-Xen) builds. If nothing else, vmalloc_to_phys
> should be used instead of __pa to convert an ioremapped virtual
> address to a valid physical address. The fix in this patch is to
> remember the original bus address as probed at boot time and to pass
> this to io_remap_pfn_range.

I'll look over this shortly.  I posted an io_remap_pfn_range() patch
to the linux-mm mailing list last week:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-ultrasparc&m=111049550001120&w=2

One of the things that it needs to take into account is that
io_remap_page_range() on sparc/sparc64 has 6 parameters instead of 5.
My patch tries to remedy that...

--
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/