Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error
From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Tue Mar 15 2005 - 12:33:01 EST
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:13:05AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Given the #ifdef mess, perhaps bridge should have the hooks available
> independent of the configuration.
The problem is the other way round:
The bridge code accesses hooks in the ATM code.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/