Re: [CIFS] Add support for updating Windows NT times/dates (part 1)

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 23:30 +0000, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> ChangeSet 1.1966.1.22, 2005/01/26 17:30:51-06:00, stevef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 	[CIFS] Add support for updating Windows NT times/dates (part 1)
> 	
> 	Signed-off-by: Steve French (sfrench@xxxxxxxxxx)
> 
> 
> 
>  cifspdu.h |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  cifssmb.c |    9 ++++++---
>  inode.c   |   11 +++++------
>  3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff -Nru a/fs/cifs/cifspdu.h b/fs/cifs/cifspdu.h
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifspdu.h	2005-03-13 15:10:44 -08:00
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifspdu.h	2005-03-13 15:10:44 -08:00
> @@ -1592,17 +1592,32 @@
>  	char LinkDest[1];
>  } FILE_UNIX_LINK_INFO;		/* level 0x201 QPathInfo */
>  
> +/* The following three structures are needed only for
> +	setting time to NT4 and some older servers via
> +	the primitive DOS time format */
>  typedef struct {
> -	__u16 CreationDate;
> -	__u16 CreationTime;
> -	__u16 LastAccessDate;
> -	__u16 LastAccessTime;
> -	__u16 LastWriteDate;
> -	__u16 LastWriteTime;
> -	__u32 DataSize; /* File Size (EOF) */
> -	__u32 AllocationSize;
> -	__u16 Attributes; /* verify not u32 */
> -	__u32 EASize;
> +	__u16 Day:5;
> +	__u16 Month:4;
> +	__u16 Year:7;
> +} SMB_DATE;
> +

if this is an on the wire format (and it looks like one) then you want
this one packed I suspect, and also I wonder if it needs to be byte
order specific...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/