Re: 2.6.11-mm3: machine check on sleep, PowerBook5.4

[Sean Neakums]

Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 19:07 +0000, Sean Neakums wrote:
>> Sean Neakums <sneakums@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > Both patches give me a successful sleep, although I had to alter the
>> > second to not #if 0 core99_ata100_enable -- there's another call to
>> > that function in pmac_feature.c's set_initial_features().
>> >
>> > I will try to gather some power numbers.
>> 
>> With the first patch, charge dropped by 33 over 52 minutes, 0.64/min.
>> With the second patch, charge dropped by 65 over 80 minutes, 0.81/min.
>
> Hi ! With the same initial charge ? The problem is that the drop isn't
> really linear...

Oh, fiddlesticks, that didn't occur to me.  I can redo with overnight
sleeps on a full charge, if you like.

-- 
Dag vijandelijk luchtschip de huismeester is dood
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/