Re: [PATCH] break_lock forever broken

[Arjan van de Ven]

> 							\
> +	if ((lock)->break_lock)						\
> +		(lock)->break_lock = 0;					\
>  }									\
if it really worth an conditional there? the cacheline of the lock is
made dirty anyway on unlock, so writing an extra 0 is like almost free
(maybe half a cycle) while a conditional jump can be 100+....


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/