Re: [PATCH] Prefaulting

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri Mar 11 2005 - 22:48:31 EST


Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> There is even a slight performance win in the
> uniprocessor case:
>
> w/o any patch:
>
> Mb Rep Thr CLine User System Wall flt/cpu/s fault/wsec
> 200 3 1 1 0.01s 0.15s 0.01s846860.493 848882.424
> 200 3 1 1 0.01s 0.16s 0.01s827724.160 830841.482
> 200 3 1 1 0.00s 0.16s 0.01s827724.160 827364.176
>
> w/prefault patch
>
> 200 MB allocation
>
> Mb Rep Thr CLine User System Wall flt/cpu/s fault/wsec
> 200 3 1 1 0.02s 0.48s 0.05s860119.275 859918.989
> 200 3 1 1 0.02s 0.46s 0.04s886129.730 886551.621
> 200 3 1 1 0.01s 0.47s 0.04s887920.166 886855.775

But the system time went through the roof. Would that be accounting
inaccuracy?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/