Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/pnp/: possible cleanups

[Adam Belay]

This patch essential makes it impossible for PnP protocols to be
modules.  Currently, they are all in-kernel.  If that is acceptable...,
then this patch looks fine to me.  Any comments?

Thanks,
Adam

On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 19:16 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch contains the following possible cleanups:
> - make needlessly global code static
> - #if 0 the following unused global function:
>   - core.c: pnp_remove_device
> - remove the following unneeded EXPORT_SYMBOL's:
>   - card.c: pnp_add_card
>   - card.c: pnp_remove_card
>   - card.c: pnp_add_card_device
>   - card.c: pnp_remove_card_device
>   - card.c: pnp_add_card_id
>   - core.c: pnp_register_protocol
>   - core.c: pnp_unregister_protocol
>   - core.c: pnp_add_device
>   - core.c: pnp_remove_device
>   - pnpacpi/core.c: pnpacpi_protocol
>   - driver.c: pnp_add_id
>   - isapnp/core.c: isapnp_read_byte
>   - manager.c: pnp_auto_config_dev
>   - resource.c: pnp_register_dependent_option
>   - resource.c: pnp_register_independent_option
>   - resource.c: pnp_register_irq_resource
>   - resource.c: pnp_register_dma_resource
>   - resource.c: pnp_register_port_resource
>   - resource.c: pnp_register_mem_resource
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
> 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/