Re: [PATCH 4/9] UML - Export gcov symbol based on gcc version

From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Fri Mar 11 2005 - 11:56:55 EST


On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 01:48:54PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> bunk@xxxxxxxxx said:
> > This patch is still wrong.
> > It seems my comment on this [1] was lost:
> > <-- snip -->
> > This line has to be something like
> > ( (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ == 3 && __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ >= 4)
> > && \
> > HEAVILY_PATCHED_SUSE_GCC )
>
> > I hope SuSE has added some #define to distinguish what they call "gcc
> > 3.3.4" from GNU gcc 3.3.4
>
> It wasn't lost - I am just disinclined to cater to distros making their
> gcc lie about its version.

And therefore you added a patch that helps only those distros at the
price of breaking other people and distros using sane compilers?

> Jeff

cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/