Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering

[szonyi calin]

 --- "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> a écrit : 
> 
> Maybe I don't understand?  Is someone expecting distro
> quality/stability from kernel.org kernels?
> I don't, but maybe I'm one of those minorities.
> 

yes. Some people (like me) would like to use from time to time
 some _new_ stable kernel. It's annoying to see that sometimes
kernel people say that you have a hardware problem in 2.6.0 
release and then the bug is silently fixed in a 2.6.5 release
for example. 

The 2.6 kernel is not good enough for desktop -- sound skips on 
a 700Mhz duron when there is a lot (50M of 256) of free memory 
and mozilla is using CPU. 2.4 with preemptible patches was 
better in that respect.

What i would like to really have is a stable version not a demo
version. I like testing but sometimes i also want stability and
it seems that a good enough 2.6 kernel is still away. 
I don't care how you call it 2.6.x.y.z-rc-kappa i just want to 
be sure that it will not mess up my system. 
(and no, i'm not going to use <insert your favourite distro>
kernel )
 
Just my 2 euro cents (if somebody cares)

P.S. I know this message is late. Sorry if it annoys you.

--
A mouse is a device used to point at 
the xterm you want to type in.
Kim Alm on a.s.r.


	

	
		
Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos mails ! 
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/