Re: [PATCH 1/2] BDI: Provide backing device capability information

[David Howells]

Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >  Making these into bitfields would result in having to use three variables
> >  instead of just the one.
> 
> Well let's do one or the other, and not have it half-and-half, please.

So I should fold the two other bitfields back into the capabilities mask and
make it an unsigned long.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/