Re: ARM undefined symbols. Again.

From: Russell King
Date: Fri Feb 25 2005 - 14:51:26 EST


On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:10:29PM +0000, Paulo Marques wrote:
> Russell King wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 10:40:53AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> >>On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:05:01PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> >>[...]
> >> LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> >>.tmp_vmlinux1: error: undefined symbol(s) found:
> >> w kallsyms_addresses
> >> w kallsyms_markers
> >> w kallsyms_names
> >> w kallsyms_num_syms
> >> w kallsyms_token_index
> >> w kallsyms_token_table
> >>
> >>Maybe kallsyms needs to provide an empty object with these symbols
> >>defined for the first linker pass, instead of using weak symbols?
> >
> >
> > So, what's the answer? Maybe this patch? With this, we can drop the
> > __attribute__((weak)) from the kallsyms symbols since they're always
> > provided.
> >
> > diff -up -x BitKeeper -x ChangeSet -x SCCS -x _xlk -x *.orig -x *.rej orig/Makefile linux/Makefile
> > --- orig/Makefile Sun Feb 13 17:26:38 2005
> > +++ linux/Makefile Sun Feb 13 17:24:17 2005
> > @@ -702,14 +702,20 @@ quiet_cmd_kallsyms = KSYM $@
> > cmd_kallsyms = $(NM) -n $< | $(KALLSYMS) \
> > $(if $(CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL),--all-symbols) > $@
> >
> > -.tmp_kallsyms1.o .tmp_kallsyms2.o .tmp_kallsyms3.o: %.o: %.S scripts FORCE
> > +.tmp_kallsyms0.o .tmp_kallsyms1.o .tmp_kallsyms2.o .tmp_kallsyms3.o: %.o: %.S scripts FORCE
> > $(call if_changed_dep,as_o_S)
> >
> > +.tmp_kallsyms0.S: FORCE
> > + @( echo ".data"; \
> > + for sym in addresses markers names num_syms token_index token_table; \
> > + do echo -e ".globl kallsyms_$$sym\nkallsyms_$$sym:\n"; done; \
> > + echo ".word 0"; ) > $@
>
> I think it would be better to pass an argument to scripts/kallsyms (like
> -0 or something) that instructed it to generate the same file it usually
> generates but without any actual symbol information.
>
> This way it will be easier to maintain this code in case new symbols are
> needed in the future. Having this done in the Makefile means that to add
> a new symbol we will have to change scripts/kallsyms, kernel/kallsyms
> and a not so clearly related Makefile.
>
> I'll try to make a small patch if I can get some time (maybe later this
> week).

So, what's happening about this?

--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/