Re: Greg's Decree! (was Re: Linus' decrees?)

[Andre Hedrick]

Greg,

Linus is not always correct, sometimes his point of view is hard to see.
My shoulders got in the way most of the time; however, Linus is
consistant.  Well until he changes his mind.

Crack ??  Get some plumber's putty to smooth over the gap.

Cheers,

Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Greg Folkert wrote:

> On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 15:03 -0500, Stuart MacDonald wrote:
> > Recently I ran across
> > http://groups.google.ca/groups?hl=en&lr=lang_en&safe=off&selm=1033074519.2698.5.
> > camel%40localhost.localdomain
> > 
> > Is there a collection point for Linus' decrees?
> > 
> > The LSB (http://www.linuxbase.org/) seems to be mostly involved with
> > how a distro is laid out, and not much to do with the kernel.
> 
> Okay, Linus decreed... oh yeah.
> 
> Exactly what is wrong with the method anyway?
> 
> You on Crack?
> 
> And no... that is not a decree in the traditional sense. It is more like
> me saying:
>         "I decree that Linus Torvalds is the lead maintainer of the
>         Linux Kernel"
> 
> Make TONS-O-SENSE to state the obvious. IOW the statement was all meant
> to say *DO IT THIS WAY AND NO OTHER* as nobody else honors any other
> method.
> -- 
> greg, greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> The technology that is
> Stronger, better, faster: Linux
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/