Re: [Lse-tech] Re: A common layer for Accounting packages

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri Feb 25 2005 - 00:31:55 EST


Kaigai Kohei <kaigai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In my understanding, what Andrew Morton said is "If target functionality can
> implement in user space only, then we should not modify the kernel-tree".

fork, exec and exit upcalls sound pretty good to me. As long as

a) they use the same common machinery and

b) they are next-to-zero cost if something is listening on the netlink
socket but no accounting daemon is running.

Question is: is this sufficient for CSA?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/