Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH] CKRM: 4/10 CKRM: Full rcfs support

[Gerrit Huizenga]

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:25:28 CST, Chris Friesen wrote:
> Shailabh Nagar wrote:
> 
> > Sounds like a case is being made to make CONFIG_RCFS a "y" and eliminate
> > the possibility of it being a loadable module ?
> 
> No, I believe the idea was to make CONFIG_RCFS be automatically set to 
> the same as CKRM.

Right, but CONFIG_CKRM is a Y/N, rcfs can be a module which is loaded
or not, depending on whether someone actually wants to *use* classes
in CKRM.

In theory, distros could build with CKRM set to "Y" but leave RCFS
as a module to simplify testing.  It dosn't matter too much to me but
it seems like having the flexibility of leaving rcfs as a module
is a nice capability.

I'm willing to be hear all comments.  ;-)

gerrit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/